| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related) |
| From: | Pasi Sjoholm <ptsjohol@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:20:18 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, H?ctor Mart?n <hector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <brad@xxxxxxxxxx>, <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <16646.14381.740376.204381@robur.slu.se> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Robert Olsson wrote: > > First run: > > timestamp diff = 0, maxlat = 4581159 > Yes you starved your user apps for ~5 sec. > Any idea where your load comes from? Pure NFS network load cannot be hard. Yeah, when the ksoftirqd is taking all the cpu it will be like that, but when the kernel is behaving normally the starving diff is between 0->1sec. With two samba-server-> workstation -> nfs-server file copys on the diff is normally 0.02secs if I'm not doing anything else but If I will do something cpu-intensive like compiling the kernel with "make -j3", the ksoftirqd will be soon taking all the cpu-time but this requires that I will also have those network file transfers going on. -- Pasi Sjöholm |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fragment ID wrap workaround (read-only, untested)., Olaf Kirch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH Linux-2.6.8-rc1] prism54 Fix initialization with older firmware, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |