On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > "resolve" next-hops. I.e., the requirement that the users/protocols will
> > give you non-final nexthop information which you have to "resolve" to get
> > the final nexthop (e.g. a global address -> a link-local address
> > obtained using Neighbor Discovery).
>
> No way to resolve exists, unless it already embedded to corresponding
> protocol.
Assume you're a host on a link with prefix 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::/64. The router
is the one with interface ID one.
What happens when you do "ping6 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::1" ? Seems to resolve a
link-local address for the router just fine.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
|