| To: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding |
| From: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:20:55 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0307151434100.4590@ns.istop.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Ralph Doncaster wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Dan Hollis wrote: > > That is exactly what it does. hw tcp checksumming helps a LOT at gbe rates > This still doesn't make any sense. The copy from user-space to kernel > space does the checksum as far as I recall (unless you use the > router-not-host kernel build option). except that 2.5.x has zerocopy and I believe NFS supports it now as well fwiw I believe sendfile() implementation was motivated a lot by hw csum support... -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: TCP IP Offloading Interface, Ralph Doncaster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow 6to4 routes with SIT, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Ralph Doncaster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |