| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding |
| From: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx>, bond-devel <bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>, Amir Noam <amir.noam@xxxxxxxxx>, Noam Marom <noam.marom@xxxxxxxxx>, Tsippy Mendelson <tsippy.mendelson@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3F1438E1.5000600@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Ben Greear wrote: > I'd consider ignoring the HW accel unless you can prove it actually helps > performance to a noticeable degree. I have never seen results of any > benchmarking > related to this... For gigabit ethernet, it makes a *H*U*G*E* difference. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Eble, Dan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |