On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307110821110.24981-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11
> Jul 2003 08:22:39 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
> > (It might be nice to have configurable /proc option on whether to enable
> > the subnet router anycast address at all, but that's also a different
> > story..)
>
> I don't like this
> while I would be ok to have configuration option
> not to support anycast.
With "not to support anycast" you probably meant "not to support
subnet-router anycast address [automatically, in the kernel, as now]" ?
These are entirely different things.
(Note that if there's a user-level API for setting anycast addresses, one
could kick the subnet-router anycast address out of the kernel too.
Whether that's desirable is another thing.)
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
|