| To: | Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch]: ipv6 tunnel for MIPv6 |
| From: | Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:36:47 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ajtuomin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Venkata Jagana <jagana@xxxxxxxxxx>, <kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0306041941480.8428-100000@morphine.tml.hut.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Henrik Petander wrote: > Hello Yoshifuji, > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > > In article <3EDE0286.4000304@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:30:30 > > +0300), Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > > > > > 2. Source address based routing > > > > I'm not sure why you need this (and tunnel) for MIP... > > Would you clearify for me? > > (IMHO, I believe we don't need this change if we use XFRM engine.) > > As far as I remember there are three main reasons for this: (Ville > correct me if forgot something) I think you've got all the main reasons. I'll get back to this issue if I suddenly remember something you forgot. :) -Ville -- Ville Nuorvala Research Assistant, Institute of Digital Communications, Helsinki University of Technology email: vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx, phone: +358 (0)9 451 5257 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.70] Tun device encapsulation, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch]: ipv6 tunnel for MIPv6, Henrik Petander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch]: ipv6 tunnel for MIPv6, Ville Nuorvala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |