| To: | Andras Kis-Szabo <kisza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up |
| From: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Nov 2002 14:08:49 +0200 (EET) |
| Cc: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / åèèæ <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1036328414.1048.3.camel@arwen> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Andras Kis-Szabo wrote: > > - export route6_me_harder() as ip6_route_harder() and > > use it from net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c. > Opsz! > At the extension parser code we got that decision that we should use > our own parser in the Netfilter code! (And we should not to trust in the > kernel.) > This patch removes one function from the Netfilter code and forces the > Netfilter to use a similar function from the kernel's one! And why is that a problem? If there is a problem in main kernel code, it should fixed. If the netfilter version is better, the main kernel code should be changed. Are there specific reasons to keep them separate? -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up, Andras Kis-Szabo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up, Andras Kis-Szabo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |