| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PSCHED_GET_TIME related bug: jiffies wraparound |
| From: | Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 May 2002 17:22:16 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200205231444.SAA11574@sex.inr.ac.ru> |
| References: | <200205231444.SAA11574@sex.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello, > > I hope the 0xffffffff change will go into pre9. > > Did Dave ack that patch? I did not resend it, to be honest. He didn't (at least not to me). I've to admit I've no experience with submitting patches to main kernel. A sent them to you because you are author of these parts and I haven't wanted to bypass you. > > I've another potential bug for you ;) > > OK. I will pack both of them. Thanks. I should say that I didn't tested the change extensively but seems to work (I didn't tested it 497 days however :). Probably the change is simple enough to be validated at the first sight. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PSCHED_GET_TIME related bug: jiffies wraparound, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | how to get per-socket stats on udp rx buffer overflow?, Chris Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PSCHED_GET_TIME related bug: jiffies wraparound, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | packet socket can't steal packets, Dmitrii Tisnek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |