| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 3C905b partial lockup in 2.4.5-pre5 and up to 2.4.6-pre1 |
| From: | Ben LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:23:33 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3B23A4BB.7B4567A3@mandrakesoft.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> rmk wrote:
> > [note I've not found anything in 2.4.5 where netif_carrier_ok prevents
> > the net layers queueing packets for an interface, and forwarding them
> > on for transmission].
>
> we want netif_carrier_{on,off} to emit netlink messages. I don't know
> how DaveM would feel about such getting implemented in 2.4.x though,
> even if well tested.
There are a lot of places that make the assumption that packets
transmitted after ifconfig eth0 .... up returns will hit the wire, and
yes, anything that does make that assumption is indeed broken. That said,
adding an extra 30s of DNS timeouts and a few more seconds of rpc timeouts
there to bootup is painful.
-ben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Q: (ab)using zerocopy for drivers with alignment contraints, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 3C905b partial lockup in 2.4.5-pre5 and up to 2.4.6-pre1, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 3C905b partial lockup in 2.4.5-pre5 and up to 2.4.6-pre1, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |