| To: | <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup |
| From: | Tim Schmielau <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:10:05 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ak@xxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200111081754.UAA24454@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > jiffies cleanup patch of the day follows. Mostly boring changes of
> > jiffies
> > comparisons to use time_{before,after} in order to handle jiffies
> > wraparound correctly.
>
> I want to _ask_ one thing people working on these changes.
> _Please_, defer this edit to 2.5. The changes are very good,
> but time for them is very bad.
>
Agreed. For now I will only post patches for code that really _is_ broken.
I've already learned that from the discussion with David Miller.
This way I might miss some places getting the comparison wrong, but
changes will be less intrusive.
However, I definitely want to see a 2.4.x someday that is able to run
for more that 497 days.
Tim
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup, Andreas Dilger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup, Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |