| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1) |
| From: | dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:18:53 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | <mingo@xxxxxxx>, <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200101100258.SAA16505@pizda.ninka.net> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:56:33 -0800 (PST) > From: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > is NFS receive single copy today? > > With the zerocopy patches, NFS client receive is "single cpu copy" if > that's what you mean. yeah sorry, i meant: - NIC DMAs packet to memory - CPU reads headers from memory, figures out it's NFS - CPU copies data bytes from packet image in memory to pagecache -dean |
| Previous by Date: | Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |