netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1

To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:40:46 +0100 (CET)
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010109102525.Q26953@ns>
Reply-to: <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Stephen Frost wrote:

>       Now, the interesting bit here is that the processes can grow to be
> pretty large (200M+, up as high as 500M, higher if we let it ;) ) and what
> happens with MOSIX is that entire processes get sent over the wire to
> other machines for work.  MOSIX will also attempt to rebalance the load on
> all of the machines in the cluster and whatnot so it can often be moving
> processes back and forth.

then you'll love the zerocopy patch :-) Just use sendfile() or specify
MSG_NOCOPY to sendmsg(), and you'll see effective memory-to-card
DMA-and-checksumming on cards that support it.

the discussion with Stephen is about various device-to-device schemes.
(which Mosix i dont think wants to use. Mosix wants to use memory to
device zero-copy, right?)

        Ingo


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>