netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2

from [davej] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2
From: davej@xxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3A06C552.4062884C@uow.edu.au>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Andrew Morton wrote:

> processor       : 0
> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> cpu family      : 6
> model           : 5
> model name      : Celeron (Covington)
> stepping        : 1
> cpu MHz         : 400.000920
> cache size      : 0 KB                                /* huh? */

Original Celeron's were cacheless. You either have one of these,
or you have your cache switched off in the BIOS.

regards,

Davej.

-- 
| Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxx>  http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems, kuznet
Next by Date:  2.4.0-test10 and tcp_input.c(1203), Petr Vandrovec
Previous by Thread:  Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2, Andrew Morton
Next by Thread:  Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2, Andrew Morton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]