Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?
From:	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:45:47 -0200 (BRST)
Cc:	riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200010062216.PAA03502@pizda.ninka.net>
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, David S. Miller wrote:

>    Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST)
>    From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>    Is this an actual bug, or am I overlooking something?
> 
> It is a bug and I'll change TCP's sendmsg to use sk->allocation as it
> should.  Thanks for pointing this out.
 

2.2.17 is broken too.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti <= Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Andi Kleen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet

Previous by Date:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]