| To: | Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ??? |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:09:34 +0200 (MEST) |
| Cc: | Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20000605102627.A8473@saw.sw.com.sg> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote: > The current kernel infrastructure for packet mangling may still need > some adjustments, but it at least exists. I'm encouraging to consider > VLAN implementation as just a netfilter module. "All the world is an IP net"? How should I run IPX over my VLANs then? greetings, Lennert |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Slow TCP connection between linux and wince, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Andrey Savochkin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Matthew Geier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |