| To: | Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ??? |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 3 Jun 2000 15:32:24 +0200 (MEST) |
| Cc: | Rob Walker <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.OSF.3.96-heb-2.07.1000603124733.9769A-100000@tochna.technion.ac.il> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Gleb Natapov wrote: > I think that the perfect solution will be to remove tags from frames > _only_ if some process actually reads ethernet headers from this vlan > device. Any ideas how this can be implemented? We could detect if there are any packet sockets (something similar to the fastroute obstacle detection)? greetings, Lennert |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Gleb Natapov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Gleb Natapov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |