netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Jeff Barrow <jeffb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 14:41:07 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3937EA35.423CB3C8@nbase.co.il>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Aliased interfaces may be depreciated, but we still require them for our
nameserver (without the aliased interfaces, bind doesn't bind to all the
IP addresses)  True, a newer version of bind might work properly; haven't
tried that.  It was more important that bind WORK quickly, and using ip
aliasing fixed the problem QUICKLY.

On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Gleb Natapov wrote:

> Rob Walker wrote:
> > 
> <snip>
> > Why should VLANs not be fake devices?  How are they different from
> > aliased interfaces?
> 
> Not so good example IMHO. Aliased interfaces are deprecated ;)
> 
> > 
> > rob
> 
> --
>                       Gleb.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>