netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPsec performance

To: Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPsec performance
From: Miika Komu <miika@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 19:14:05 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1115129839.2953.4.camel@ori.thedillows.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022117190.25766@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022204090.25766@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505030248020.26815@kaber.coreworks.de> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030820160.24686@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <1115099678.2953.3.camel@ori.thedillows.org> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030943310.247@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <1115129839.2953.4.camel@ori.thedillows.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Dillow wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:44 +0300, Miika Komu wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Dillow wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:25 +0300, Miika Komu wrote:
> > > > However, this does explain why I got only 1.9 megabytes/s with 3DES.
> > >
> > > What was your hardware? Without knowing what you're running on, it's
> > > impossible to tell if that is good or bad.
> > >
> > > Linux Journal was getting ~5.5MB/s on a PIV 2.2GHz.
> > > I get ~2.1MB/s on a 550MHz Athlon.
> >
> > Intel Pentium III 500 MHz
>
> 3DES is processor intensive. I'd say 1.9MB/s is reasonable for the
> hardware you are on.

Ok. Thanks for your quick responses!

-- 
Miika Komu              miika@xxxxxx          http://www.iki.fi/miika/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>