| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:21:14 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021210035532.GA22559@gtf.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I would summarize his patch as adding variable to represent literally > ifOperStatus, along with a lock and apparatus to set this variable. > > The value may be deduced, without having to literally track it. If it can be deduced then no point in tracking it. i think my shepherding of the patch is done at this point. I'll let you take it from here. BTW, I still think theres need to clean up the qdisc queues when a link goes operationaly down. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pci-skeleton duplex check, Donald Becker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pci-skeleton duplex check, Donald Becker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |