| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] explicit connection confirmation |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Nov 2002 06:22:00 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Marc Boucher <marc@xxxxxxx>, bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021107152758.GB23858@gnu.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Hi, > > netfilter, yeah, sure, 'could have', but please. apology if i sounded like one of those adolescent netfilter dangerous fools who show up with "mama, look what i can do with a packet now that ive read netfilter docs" > > 'Make it a netfilter module' is generally what people say when > they are confronted with a feature they don't like. My angle was to avoid being intrusive to the tcp code. you might get a fish sent to you in .nl in an armani suit;-> > > There was a thread about this in private mail round April this year, > in which some good points were raised. > There are some good points; however, whats the app for this feature? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPv6 development plan ?, bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NAPI-ized tulip patch against 2.4.20-rc1, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] explicit connection confirmation, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] explicit connection confirmation, bert hubert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |