| To: | "James R. Leu" <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Virtual Routing and Forwarding |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:11:01 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021021223810.A23086@nero.doit.wisc.edu> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I think you are mucking with too many things. heres some thoughts: - use aliases - tag skbs based on which local aliases they arrived destined to and send them to the right VR - use multi routing table feature already available on linux Of course this is the easy part. Separation of VRs is going to be the challenge (talking about CPU and memory isolation - such that for example gated for VR1 doesnt talk to gated for VR2) cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: NIC on 2.4.19 SMP (mii-diag output), Felipe W Damasio |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog., jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] Virtual Routing and Forwarding, James R. Leu |
| Next by Thread: | Æ÷¸£³ë ! ÇÏÁö¸¸ DVD¶ó³× !, ½ÅÀºÇÏ |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |