Re: udp weirdness

[jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, jamal wrote:

> was to use sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr only in the case of all is
> clean from the device layer.

Of course if you want to say sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr is higher
priority then the patch becomes;->

--- ip_output.c 2002/09/29 08:50:36     1.1
+++ ip_output.c 2002/09/30 06:38:32
@@ -603,8 +603,9 @@
                err = NF_HOOK(PF_INET, NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT, skb, NULL,
                              skb->dst->dev, output_maybe_reroute);
                if (err) {
-                       if (err > 0)
-                               err = sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr ? 
net_xmit_errno(err) : 0;
+                       if (err > 0) {
+                                err = sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr ? 
sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr:net_xmit_errno(err);
+                       }
                        if (err)
                                goto error;
                }
@@ -713,8 +714,9 @@

        err = NF_HOOK(PF_INET, NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT, skb, NULL, rt->u.dst.dev,
                      output_maybe_reroute);
-       if (err > 0)
-               err = sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr ? net_xmit_errno(err) : 0;
+       if (err > 0) {
+                       err = sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr ? 
sk->protinfo.af_inet.recverr:net_xmit_errno(err);
+       }
        if (err)
                goto error;
 out: