| To: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>@shell.cyberus.ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: "Loopback" route through two cards? |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Sep 2002 07:30:46 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <anton@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020903050441.4052F2C414@lists.samba.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Unless you are trying to stress test NAT, i wouldnt go the NAT path. Have you looked at the packet generator in 2.4.19? With it you can bypass IP totaly. cheers, jamal On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > I know this is an FAQ, but I never saw an answer I liked. We > want to stress-test a couple of gigabit NICs by connecting them to > each other and routing packets out one and into the other. Is this > still impossible without nat? > > Rusty. > -- > Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | "Loopback" route through two cards?, Rusty Russell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | "Loopback" route through two cards?, Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, Eric Lemoine |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |