| To: | "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <weixl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines. |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:59:33 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cheng Jin <chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cheng Hu <chenghu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Low <slow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <009701c24d54$d27304a0$f1fa010a@weixl> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Xiaoliang (David) Wei wrote: > Hi Ben and Jamal, > Are you guys sure that getdayoftime per packet is a big overhead on > Gbps connection? We may be talking about different things; I am talking about do_gettimeofday -- which is very expensive. Anyone who has time could look at improving that. It is run per incoming packet. > Do you compare the performance with getdayoftime per packet and > without? I think it would be pretty noticeable if you got rid of the per-incoming-packet calls to do_gettimeofday > I guess RFC 1323 specifies that each packet should have a timestamp > (although not from getdayoftime). In Linux, this is cleverly based on the system clock (jiffies). cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |