| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:24:44 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | <ltd@xxxxxxxxx>, <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020610.051857.97850707.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Lincoln Dale <ltd@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 22:03:25 +1000 > > would you be willing to accept a patch that enables per-socket > accounting with a CONFIG_ option? > > What is the point? > > If all the dists will enable it then everybody eats the overhead. > If the dists don't enable it, how useful is it and what's so wrong > with it being an external patch people just apply when they need to > diagnose something like this? > I think i would agree with Dave for it to be an external patch. You really only need this during debugging. I had a similar patch when debugging NAPI about a year ago. I didnt find it that useful after a while because i could deduce the losses from SNMP/netstat output. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Mark Mielke |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Mark Mielke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |