RE: dst cache overflow 2.2.x; x>=16

[jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Milam, Chad wrote:

> At the end of the day, my patch was not trying to avoid GC, or eliminate
> it.  It was just
> there to keep the box from going completely dead...

I dont think yourt patch guarantees this (you are nuking routes that
may still be actively used) -- i think you may have been lucky so far.
Regardless, this seems to be  an interesting case of fixing what appears
to be a application bug with a kernel patch. Its amazing what you can do
when you have source.

cheers,
jamal

PS:- the fact that you are running 2.2 is useful information that
you left out.