netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Patch: Device operative state notification against 2.5.7

To: Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patch: Device operative state notification against 2.5.7
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:26:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0204071538220.12041-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, jamal wrote:

> The only useful state transitions are to/from IFOP_DOWN_NOCARRIER
> in my opinion. What do you think?

I meant this view from a "listener" perspective; example from an
SNMP NMS perspective or even a dynamic route daemon, this is the only
really interesting state transition. So IMO, it only makes sense to send
netlink messages for these.

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>