| To: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:07:03 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20011209225350.A22512@outpost.ds9a.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, bert hubert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 04:45:01PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > > > Cant think of a straight way to do this .... Alexey would know, > > > > > > SO_PRIORITY. Or I did not follow you? > > > > So priority limits the size of skb->priority to be from 0..6; this wont > > work with that check in cbq. > > No, only IP_TOS does so. > probaly ip precedence. Have you tried this or you are following what the man pages say? cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, bert hubert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |