| To: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:10:41 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20011209023029.A25580@outpost.ds9a.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, bert hubert wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 08:14:10PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > AFAICT, the priomap maps skb->priority to band. So the translation is as > follows: > yes ;-> > > > > so do prio and pfifo_fast (as i am sure you are aware) > > Of course, but only CBQ (& HTB, by the way) can extract a classid directly > from it, without a priomap. Devik is planning to learn HTB to extract a > classid directly from the fwmark, to skip a layer of indirection. > I am not sure if this is such a nice hack. Whats wrong with with using the fwmark classifier to select classes? cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!), bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!), bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |