| To: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:20:32 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <E15qcES-0000rh-00@the-village.bc.nu> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > It doesnt save you from horrible performance. NAPI is there to do that, it > saves you from a dead box. You can at least rmmod the cardbus controller > with protection in place (or go looking for the problem with a debugger) I hear you, but I think isolation is important; If i am telneted (literal example here) onto that machine (note eth0 is not cardbus based) and cardbus is causing the loops then iam screwed. [The same applies to everything that shares interupts] cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Andrea Arcangeli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Andrea Arcangeli |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |