| To: | Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:41:39 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110040831020.1727-100000@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i'm asking the following thing. dev->quota, as i read the patch now, can > cause extra calls to ->poll() even though the RX ring of that particular > device is empty and the driver has indicated it's done processing RX > packets. (i'm now assuming that the extra-polling-for-a-jiffy line in the > current patch is removed - that one is a showstopper to begin with.) Is > this claim of mine correct? There should be no extra calls to ->poll() and if there are we should fix them. Take a look at the state machine i posted earlier. The one liner is removed. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Ingo Molnar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |