| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:58:57 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3BBB31F4.C223E12E@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Ben Greear wrote: > jamal wrote: > > > No. NAPI is for any type of network activities not just for routers or > > sniffers. It works just fine with servers. What do you see in there that > > will make it not work with servers? > > Will NAPI patch, as it sits today, fix all IRQ lockup problems for > all drivers (as Ingo's patch claims to do), or will it just fix > drivers (eepro, tulip) that have been integrated with it? Unfortunately amongst the three of us tulip seemed to be the most common. Robert has a gige intel. So patches appear only for those two drivers. I could write up a document on how to change drivers. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Ingo Molnar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |