| To: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ECN: Clearing the air |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:11:01 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010128225530.A1300@bug.ucw.cz> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Does not that mean that Linux 2.0.10 mistakenly announces it is ECN > capable when offered ECN connection? In fact it does. But as someone mentioned, ECN is resilient to this. i.e this will be trapped and no ECN connection will happen. For historical purposes, let it be noted that it was the Linux ECN implementation in the 2.0 days that made this change in the RFC possible. "we believe in running code ..." -- yes, indeed. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ion Badulescu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Walter Hofmann |
| Next by Thread: | New toy: tc simulator, Werner Almesberger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |