| To: | David Ford <david@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:08:12 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101072232330.12242-100000@Huntington-Beach.Blue-Labs.org> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote: > Distributions should be encouraged to use ip rather than ifconfig/route. It > works better and does more, the output is more informative, more concise, > and less confusing. It doesn't take that much more disk space than ifconfig > and route does, ifconfig and route take 74K, ip takes 89K. I don't think 15k > of disk space is sufficient concern, given that inodes are probably page > size. Actually if you count arp which is also part of ip; ip becomes smaller by about 15K. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David Ford |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Blu3Viper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |