| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:21:11 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A58BD44.1381D182@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote: > > Question: How do devices with hardware vlan support fit into your model ? > > I don't know of any, and I'm not sure how they would be supported. > erm, this is a MUST. You MUST factor the hardware VLANs and be totaly 802.1q compliant. Also of interest is 802.1P and D. We must have full compliance, not some toy emulation. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |