| To: | Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PPP over X |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:15:50 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxx, Mark Spencer <markster@xxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Marc Boucher <marc@xxxxxxx>, paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20000203111517.I72648@sfgoth.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
mitch> I agree, especially if you're running a PPPoE session server, where mitch> you need hundreds of simultaneous sessions demuxed. mitch> You just need to be able to select and/or poll; you dont necessarily need sockets for that mitch> a protocol to the ppp_generic stuff can be. Ignore the mitch> ATTACH_ENCAPS mitch> ioctl - I was smoking something when I decided I needed that... mitch> really setting the encapsulation should be a seperate ioctl (like mitch> setting the tty options in ppp_async works) mitch> I think it looks bad because you were trying to do this on pppd. It should be OK if you did it in say a pppoatmd; cheers jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Michal Ostrowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Michal Ostrowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |