| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch |
| From: | Mehulkumar J Patel <mehul.patel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:54:37 +0530 |
| Cc: | Matthias Fruehauf <mfrueh@xxxxxxx>, olaf@xxxxxxx, Anil K Prasad <aprasad@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daljeet Maini <mdaljeet@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Hi, We at IBM need IP CROSSOVER module as part of kernel source. I sent the request to SuSe for the same and they got back to me and their response is in this mail thread below. Can you please let me know what do you think about IP CROSSOVER feature ? best regards, Mehul. ----- Forwarded by Mehulkumar J Patel/India/IBM on 27/10/2003 17:42 -----
On Wed, Sep 24, Kaena Freitas wrote: > > > > > Hello Mehul - > > Sorry it has taken me a while to respond. We do not keep any code in CMVC. > All code we get from SuSE is on the ftp3 site along with all the source > RPMs. We do have internel CVS trees, but there is no guarantee that those > trees are current with the code we get from SuSE which is what your team > should be testing. > > As for the htx patch you've provided, I have copied SuSE on this email to > get their comments if it can be part of their distribution. Good morning, did you sent the patch to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx? What opinion have the network and iptables maintainers about this feature? > (See attached file: hxecom_patch)forgot to attach the patch. > > > e-mail: mehul.patel@xxxxxxxxxx > IBM Global Services > Bangalore, India. > Tel: 091-80-5094160 > > > > > Mehulkumar J > Patel To: Kaena Freitas/Austin/IBM > cc: Anil K Prasad/India/IBM@IBMIN, Daljeet > 23/09/2003 18:38 Maini/India/IBM@IBMIN > Please respond to From: Mehulkumar J Patel/India/IBM@IBMIN > Subject: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch > > > > > > > Hi, > > We are HTX Team. > We get affected by changes in Linux kernel in a way where we have to update > our build environment > continuously. As of now we are doing so manually. But considering the > effort we are thinking of making > it automated. > > Can you please tell us if there is a fixed place from where we can sync > Linux kernel sources through > scripts. Or do you put Linux kernel sources in cmvc or any other version > control system. > > Also, we have an exerciser named "hxecom" which requires an external patch, > ip_crossover for hxecom > to work in single system test. > This patch helps us in sending packets destined to IP address on the same > machine without looping > back at IP layer. Packet actually goes out to hardware and thus we are able > to stress network cards. > For this patch to work, kernel should have been compiled with netfilter. > If netfilter is not enabled and ip_crossover patch is not applied, we end > up recompiling the whole > stuff and need to copy kernel and /lib/modules on all the test machines, > which is bit ugly. > Can you please include these two request from us in all p-series kernels ? > > I am attaching the patch here. > > best regards, > Mehul. > e-mail: mehul.patel@xxxxxxxxxx > IBM Global Services > Bangalore, India. > Tel: 091-80-5094160 > > > -- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Disabling IPv6 accept_ra on just some interface, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] IPV6: inappropriate usage of inet{,6}_sk(), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | iproute2 and 2.6.0-test9, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |