| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 MIB:ipv6PrefixTable implementation |
| From: | Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:33:13 -0800 |
| Cc: | mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Importance: | Normal |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sensitivity: |
Hi, Alexy, > preferred time is not an attribute of a prefix at all, > it is attribute of address, is not it? Unless the prefix is used > to install local address it does not make sense, right? The new IPv6 MIBs said that the preferred time is saved in the prefix table, not in the address table. Also, not every onlink prefix is saved in the routing table, for example, if there is already a manual address configured for an interface with the same prefix. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR 97006-6063 Phone: (503) 578-7638 FAX: (503) 578-3228 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: A request to add RTPROT_XORP to linux/rtnetlink.h, Pavlin Radoslavov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ROUTE] PMTU only works on half the time, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Inserting a layer between TCP and IP, Helmut Berger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |