| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Jumbogram!-checksum! |
| From: | Nawab Hasan <hnawab@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:13:18 +1000 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, in Ipv6 the jumbogram packet could be as large as 4294967296 octet.It will be overhead for calculating the checksum for TCP and UDP(pseudo header).It will in turn degrade the performance if not what are other methods for getting the integrate ipv6 packet over ipv6 node.Could someone help me out on this issue? Nawab |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Giuliano Pochini |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Richard B. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | how data travels across tcp stack?, Parag Nemade |
| Next by Thread: | Assassination of TIME_WAIT state, Michael T Kerrisk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |