> Unsigned arithmetic is fine. The _correct_ way to test whether something
> is in within
>
> [ start , start+HZ ]
>
> is to do
>
> if (jiffies - start <= HZ)
>
> try it. The C language guarantees that unsigned arithmetic works in a
> "modulo power of two" fashion, which means that it _is_ ok to do
> arithmetic on unsigned longs, and jiffy wrapping does not matter. No need
> to cast to "signed" or anything else.
>
> In short: It is wrong to do
>
> if (jiffies <= start+HZ)
>
> and it is _right_ to do
>
> if (jiffies - start <= HZ)
Actually this last part is wrong, isn't it ? jiffies <= start + HZ is also
a correct way to do it, since start+HZ will overflow to the current value
of
jiffies when HZ time elapses. So the above two statements are IDENTICAL. I
agree with the rest of the statements, and especially that you don't need
to worry about wrapping using unsigned numbers.
Regards,
- KK
> (as long as "start" is "unsigned long" like jiffies).
>
> Linus
|