netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6inetNetToMediaTable

To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6inetNetToMediaTable
From: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:13:03 -0800
Cc: mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sensitivity:

Why shouldn't the kernel provide the real MIBs information? Is it breaking any application if I make the right changes?

Thanks
Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
15300 SW Koll Parkway
Beaverton, OR 97006-6063
Phone: (503) 578-7638
FAX: (503) 578-3228


Sent by: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: Shirley Ma/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS
cc: mashirle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6inetNetToMediaTable


In article <OFE052816E.2064C677-ON88256E1C.0063EDA2@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:18:44 -0800), Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> Thanks. This is a bug fix for the update value (last change) to be a
> TimeStamp according to new IP MIBs. There is no confirm value in the new IP
> MIBs inetNetTomedia Entry, I don't know what's the confirm for, I still
> keep it, but change it to TimeStamp. Is there any application using these
> values right now? If you agree we can fix any applications reference these
> values.

ditto. application should obtain real MIB information using
information provided by kernel.
(If information is not enough, let kernel provide additional
information.)

--yoshfuji


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>