| To: | Mitsuru KANDA / 神田 充 <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6 |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jun 2003 02:01:42 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <87fzmv5ejc.wl@karaba.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Mitsuru KANDA / [ISO-2022-JP] $B?@ED(B $B=<(B wrote: > Anyway, I have one discussion point. > When we use 'setkey -D', xfrm ipip tunnels are displayed as unspec SAs. > Do we need to filter out these xfrm_states other than AH/ESP/IPcomp > in case of PF_KEY based queries? Good question. We need to either filter them out or make sure they are displayed as ipip. Part of the answer will depend on whether we want to expose xfrm-based ipip tunnels for general use, or only use them internally for ipcomp. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6, Mitsuru KANDA / 神田 充 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6, Mitsuru KANDA / 神田 充 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6, James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |