| To: | "Alexey Kuznetsov" <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: conflicting alignment requirements |
| From: | "Jacob Avraham" <jacoba@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:17:41 +0200 |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <200107260647.KAA00350@mops.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Hello! > > > > > On the other hand, some upper layer code, like tc > > > > (for non x86/68k), checks if the IP header is 4 byte align, > > Do you know any architecture except for these ones which are able > to generate unaligned packets? I do not. And if you do, please, > enlighten me about them. > I was referring to packets coming from the Tulip h/w (not generated by the CPU), on which the IP header is alway unalinged. If the driver is configured NOT to copy the packet to a fresh skb (rx_copybreak = 0), the packet will traverse the net layer with unalinged IP header. -Jacob |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: oops/bug in tcp, SACK doesn't work?, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, clemens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: conflicting alignment requirements, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: conflicting alignment requirements, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |