| To: | "bert hubert" <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: ipsec null encryption slower than AES / was Re: 2.6 IPSec Throughput puzzle |
| From: | "Shekhar Kshirsagar" <shekhark@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:51:13 -0800 |
| Cc: | "Networking Team" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcTwRXsiJ+Iw7jziRpSFpNj9LgAvnAATxiJX |
| Thread-topic: | ipsec null encryption slower than AES / was Re: 2.6 IPSec Throughput puzzle |
> From your numbers below it is clear all ipsec benchmarks have maxed out your > CPU, but aes/sha1 still has some hits in default_idle. Is this an SMP > system? No, it is not running SMP kernel. (The system is SMP). About little time being sent in default_idle, I think,it was because I was little late in performing dump. I redid the test and the CPU was maxed out even in aes/sha1 case. > http://www.certconf.org/presentations/2004/Tuesday/TS2.pdf - the concept is > called 'the scatterlist'. > http://lwn.net/Articles/14010/?format=printable is also nice. Thanks, for the pointers. I will see, if I can isolate the problem. Shekhar |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2.6.10-bk4 ip_conntrack oops fix, Matthew J Galgoci |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ip6tables: accept of IPv6 transport esp packages not possible - no rule matches, Peter Bieringer |
| Previous by Thread: | ipsec null encryption slower than AES / was Re: 2.6 IPSec Throughput puzzle, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | A Question On CBQ, Zhenyu Wu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |