| To: | "Eble, Dan" <DanE@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [bonding][patch] Change locking scheme |
| From: | "Hen, Shmulik" <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:45:43 +0300 |
| Cc: | bond-devel <bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bond-announce <bonding-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eble, Dan [mailto:DanE@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:43 PM > To: Hen, Shmulik > Subject: RE: [bonding][patch] Change locking scheme > > > week or so, and so far problems were detected. It was tested in all > ^^^ > > Could you clarify this please? :-) Oops. Meant to say "and so far NO problems were detected." ;-) Shmulik. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] linux/net.h: bye bye struct net_proto, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] snmp6 stats as %lu, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [bonding][patch] Change locking scheme, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | loopback interface and soft irqs, John Heffner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |