netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Bonding-devel] [patch] (2/8) Add 802.3ad support to bonding

To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Marom, Noam" <noam.marom@xxxxxxxxx>, "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Bonding-devel] [patch] (2/8) Add 802.3ad support to bonding
From: "Hen, Shmulik" <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:42:06 +0300
Cc: bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Vosburgh [mailto:fubar@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 AM
> To: Hen, Shmulik; Marom, Noam; Feldman, Scott
> Cc: bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Bonding-devel] [patch] (2/8) Add 802.3ad 
> support to bonding 
> 
>       If, however, I use "ifenslave -d bond0 ethX" (where ethX is
> one of the active interfaces, by which I mean one with traffic flowing
> over it), it takes a considerable amount of real time for bonding to
> recover and transfer the connection to a new interface.  It appears
> that the deleted interface must be either the transmitting or
> receiving interface (I'm not sure which), as sometimes it recovers
> immediately.  Removing an idle interface from the bond does not appear
> to cause any stalls.
> 

We'll be investigating this behavior and try to reproduce it in our lab
(probably early next week).


        Shmulik.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>