| To: | kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Phil Oester) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops? |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:51:30 +1000 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050603232413.GA29308@linuxace.com> |
| Organization: | Core |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.27-hx-1-686-smp (i686)) |
Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I know the proposed LLTX changes were meant to address a race while > the queue_lock was dropped - is the above another illustration of the > race potential? I'd say that either you're using a dodgy qdisc, or your hardware is just stuffed. That is, if you are using the default qdisc, you should start looking at replacing pieces of the hardware to find the problem. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops?, Phil Oester |
| Previous by Thread: | Unitialized queue_lock oops?, Phil Oester |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops?, Phil Oester |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |