| To: | christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx (Christoph Lameter) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: atomic_dec_and_test for child dst needed in dst_destroy? |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:19:12 +1000 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504051507250.17203@server.graphe.net> |
| Organization: | Core |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.27-hx-1-686-smp (i686)) |
Christoph Lameter <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If that is so then it is also possible that the gc frees after > atomic_dec_and_test: No this is prevented by the nohash check. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] NETLINK_UESTABLISHED notifier event, Dmitry Yusupov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPSEC]: Kill nested read lock by deleting xfrm_init_tempsel, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: atomic_dec_and_test for child dst needed in dst_destroy?, Christoph Lameter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: atomic_dec_and_test for child dst needed in dst_destroy?, Christoph Lameter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |