| To: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] eepro100: remove ID for 82556 |
| From: | Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:08:02 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <4216C8A3.4020303@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.7.6-20040906 ("Baleshare") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.11-rc4 (i686)) |
JG> I see the thread, but I still worry about removing the id in your patch, JG> since the poster in the thread says that they had to -add- an ID to both JG> e100 and eepro100 in order to perform their test. JG> JG> Has anyone with this PCI ID actually confirmed that eepro100 does not JG> work for them? I added the PCI ID only to e100, it was already present in eepro100. Neither unmodified eepro100 nor pci-id-added e100 worked with this chip so IMHO it's safe to remove this PCI ID from eepro100 too. -- Meelis Roos |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [XFRM]: Always reroute in tunnel mode, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] emac: filter illegal frame sizes, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] eepro100: remove ID for 82556, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] eepro100: remove ID for 82556, John Ronciak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |