Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Assuming there is only a few listeners per process. I tried it out and
> my UP system could handle 7 listeners in the same process but would
> sporadically overrun above. I couldn't reproduce it with 1 listener
> per process anymore.
Please recall what I said in my original message:
: Before we start please bear in mind that netlink is fundamentally
: an *unreliable* protocol. This is the price we pay in order to use
: it in all the contexts that we do. So what we're looking for here
: is not how to make netlink 100% reliable, but what we can do to
: improve the quality of its implementation.
Having 7 listeners in the same process isn't really the killer application
I was looking for :)
> Therefore I guess this is fine for now, the problem might appear again
> if someone finally writes the netlink daemon to solve the locking
> problems.
I don't think I understand what you are referring to. Could you
please elaborte?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
|